What is the significance of SU(2,4) in Group Theory?

AI Thread Summary
SU(2,4) refers to a specific special unitary group, which is the unitary analog of the special orthogonal group SO(2,4). The "4" in SU(2,4) indicates the dimensionality related to the hermitian inner product of signature (2,4), with the field typically being the complex numbers. Discussions highlight the importance of distinguishing between different types of fields in group theory, as this affects the group's properties. The conversation also emphasizes caution against citing Wikipedia due to its potential instability and unreliability. Understanding SU(2,4) is crucial for grasping concepts in advanced group theory.
princeton118
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What does this expression, SU(2,4), mean?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's the notation for a specific group. Also see this Wikipedia page, specifically under the "Generalized ... group" section.
 
But in the Generalized Linear Group the second term in the parentheses is the Field. But here what does the "4" mean?
 
Probably the finite field with 4 elements.
 
I see thanks!
 
Correction! Correct field is C with hermitian IP of signature (2,4)

Uh oh, hope the OP sees this! The special unitary group SU(p,q) is the unitary analog of the special orthogonal group SO(p,q). For example, SO(2,4) comes from the pseudo-euclidean inner product
<br /> \left(\vec{u}, \, \vec{v} \right) =<br /> -u_1 \, v_1 - u_2 \, v_2 + u_3 \, v_3 + u_4 \, v_4 + u_5 \, v_5 + u_6 \, v_6<br />
and SU(2,4) comes from the hermitian analog. The field is generally the complex numbers for unitary groups or real numbers for orthogonal groups, but other fields can be considered and then an extra letter is added to indicate this.

How annoying! The only hit Google gives me is " Generalized special unitary group" in this version of this WP article which I happen to know is basically correct, but do as I say not as I do: never cite Wikipedia articles because Wikipedia is unstable and unreliable!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top