A few qustions about Dark Matter from a beginner.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of dark matter and its potential effects on the speed of light. While light slows down when passing through materials like glass due to atomic interactions, there is no evidence suggesting that dark matter affects light in a similar way. Dark matter does not emit or absorb light, and its presence is primarily inferred through gravitational lensing, which allows mapping of its density. Some participants speculate that dense clouds of dark matter might slightly slow light due to gravitational effects, but this would be negligible and likely unobservable. The conversation encourages further exploration and questions about dark matter and its properties.
721
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!
As i said in the topic i am still very new in the field, so if my questions are stupid and just a waste of time i apoligize. The stuff i know I've learned by myself so there are gaps.

Anyway, onto my question:

Speed of Light(C) travels at 3*108m/s in a vacuum, but when traveling through glas(for example) the speed is only 2*108m/s.

Then we have Dark Matter, which doesn't emit or absorb light, neither does it interract with matter as far as we know. But it is still all around us, is it possible that the velocity of C changes when traveling through dark matter? As it does when traveling through glas?

 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A few = One question apparently, my apoligies for the misleading topic.
 
There is no evidence dark matter interacts with light save for gravitational lensing.
 
721 said:
...
Then we have Dark Matter, which doesn't emit or absorb light, neither does it interract with matter as far as we know. But it is still all around us, is it possible that the velocity of C changes when traveling through dark matter? As it does when traveling through glas?
...

Hi 721, welcome! That's a good question. This place runs on people who want to learn something asking intelligent questions. I agree with what Chronos said about no evidence for speed change.

Dark matter is a fascinating topic. It is something to keep pursuing and asking about. Do you know about gravitational lensing (Wkpd probably has some informative articles about DM and how clouds of it are mapped by socalled "weak" gravitational lensing.)

Denser patches of DM distort the background images of more distant galaxies more, that we see thru the "lens" of the clouds of DM. So the clouds can be mapped and their density variations can be mapped. Find out all you can about DM because research on it is progressing, it is a good learning "investment" if you watch science for enjoyment.

You could also go over into the Physics section and ask WHY glass and water slow down light. It must be because their atoms are interacting with the light as it goes thru. It is standard college physics textbook stuff but nevertheless fascinating. What is the interaction that slows down the light? They'd probably explain it to you over in General Physics forum, or Classical.

Actually you know maybe Chronos and I didn't tell you everything about your question. My intuition is that a dense enough cloud of DM would slow light a little bit while it was traveling thru the cloud because time passes more slowly deep down in a gravity well. But in realworld cases the effect would be very slight. Probably too small to ever have been observed. It would be associated with "strong" gravitational lensing. Dense concentrations of mass can actually focus plane waves like a magnifying glass. DM is too diffuse to have that effect be measurable. The weak grav lensing that DM does is a more subtle effect of slightly distorting shape.

Have fun here, keep asking sensible questions like this. Again, welcome.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top