A force problem that seems easy but hard

  • Thread starter Thread starter cy19861126
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Hard
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks connected by a string over a pulley, with one block made of aluminum and the other of copper. The participants are attempting to determine the acceleration of the blocks and the tension in the string using force equations. There is confusion regarding the correct application of forces, particularly the need to resolve tension along the inclined plane and the role of the normal force. Clarifications are made that both blocks should be analyzed using simultaneous equations, with emphasis on the correct coordinate system for the copper block. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately defining forces and directions in solving the problem.
cy19861126
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
A 2.00-kg aluminum block and a 6.00-kg copper block are connected by a light string over a frictionless pulley. The two blocks are allowed to move on a fixed steel block wedge (of angle 30.0) as shown in Figure P4.53. Making use of Table 4.2, determine (a) the acceleration of the two blocks and (b) the tension in the string.

My work so far:
For the aluminum block - I got T = 2a, which I cannot solve
For the copper block - I got Tx-58.8sin(30) = 6a - this is for x direction
and
Ny-58.8cos(30) = 6a - this is for y direction

58.8 is the weight force, which comes from 6*9.8 = 58.8N
T = tension force
N = Normal force

All the equations won't get me to solve for acceleration for either blocks

Thanks~~

If you cannot see the attachment, you may click http://students.washington.edu/cy1126/P4.53.jpg"
 

Attachments

  • Fig 4.53.JPG
    Fig 4.53.JPG
    5.5 KB · Views: 903
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need an x for the direction of T for the copper block since you are resolving it along the surface of the plane. Once you get this, its semple simultaneous equations.
 
QuantumCrash said:
You don't need an x for the direction of T for the copper block since you are resolving it along the surface of the plane. Once you get this, its semple simultaneous equations.
I see what you are saying, but for the copper block, I defined the x-axis to be the the ramp. Therefore, the coordinate diagram is a slanted one, not a standard one. As a result, you need Tx
 
Neither block is accelerating in the y as you have defined it. Tension is purely in the x. You then get 2 equations with 2 unknowns because the tensions and accelerations are equal
 
If I get what you mean, you should not do that becaus you would need to take into account the normal force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top