A good video on the Higgs Boson

Forestman
Messages
212
Reaction score
2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
it's short (5.5 mins), but it doesn't really say any more than the interaction of the Higgs boson with any particle is proportional to the rest-mass of the particle (so it interacts with everything except the photon the gluon and the graviton), and since the Higgs field is everywhere and needs no source, that means any particle wherever it is is affected all the time …

"the Higgs particle acts like sticky bits that put a drag on other particles, and it is this drag that we detect as rest-mass" (4:30)​

… that really doesn't explain anything, and is essentially wrong since it suggests that it should make a free particle decelerate :frown:
 
tiny-tim said:
it's short (5.5 mins), but it doesn't really say any more than the interaction of the Higgs boson with any particle is proportional to the rest-mass of the particle (so it interacts with everything except the photon the gluon and the graviton), and since the Higgs field is everywhere and needs no source, that means any particle wherever it is is affected all the time …

"the Higgs particle acts like sticky bits that put a drag on other particles, and it is this drag that we detect as rest-mass" (4:30)​

… that really doesn't explain anything, and is essentially wrong since it suggests that it should make a free particle decelerate :frown:

Can't agree more
 
Thanks for the link.
tiny-tim said:
"the Higgs particle acts like sticky bits that put a drag on other particles, and it is this drag that we detect as rest-mass" (4:30)​

… that really doesn't explain anything, and is essentially wrong since it suggests that it should make a free particle decelerate :frown:
I tend to agree. Not that I understand the concept of a virtual particle or the mechanism by which the Higgs boson is supposed to create inertia.

I don't understood how the idea of the Higgs field fits with relativity. Could one not associate an inertial reference frame with the Higgs field? How does this differ from an inertianiferous aether?

AM
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top