A heating element in a container with low pressure gas?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a heating element in a container filled with low pressure gas, specifically focusing on the final temperature of the gas when subjected to a constant heating power. Participants explore the implications of maintaining a heating element at a high temperature and its effects on the gas temperature over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the final temperature of the low pressure gas will exceed the temperature of the heating element, which is set at 2500 Kelvin.
  • There is speculation about whether the heating element would remain on indefinitely or shut off once the gas reaches a certain temperature.
  • One participant suggests that if the heating element continues to supply 500 W, its temperature may rise above 2500 Kelvin, leading to an increase in the gas temperature.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the melting point of the heating element, which is 2500 Kelvin, and how this relates to achieving higher temperatures in the gas, such as 30,000 Kelvin, as mentioned in an experimental context.
  • Some participants propose that alternative mechanisms, such as viscous heating from stirring, might be necessary to achieve higher temperatures in the gas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the heating element's temperature and the gas temperature, with no consensus on whether the gas can exceed 2500 Kelvin or how that might be achieved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the mechanisms that could allow for higher gas temperatures.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of the heating element's maximum temperature and the implications of the first law of thermodynamics in a rigid container, but do not resolve the complexities surrounding the heating dynamics and material properties.

randombill
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
This is just a qualitative question but feel free to show an equation if possible.

Basically if you have a container with a heating element, let's say 500 W with a temperature of 2500 Kelvins and inside this box is a low pressure ideal gas, something like 1/100 of an atmosphere. Also imagine that the walls of the container do not let heat escape. The question I have is what would be the final temperature of the low pressure gas (after a considerable time), higher than the temperature of the heating element at 2500 Kelvin or just the same. I'm assuming a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution would describe the speeds of the particles and the temperature of a particle is (3/2)K_bT.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What are your thoughts on this? Would the heater be left on after a long time, or shut off?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
What are your thoughts on this? Would the heater be left on after a long time, or shut off?

Chet
Let's imagine that the heater would only stay on at 2500k. The reason I ask this is because of the experiment at UW call the http://plasma.physics.wisc.edu/viewpage.php?id=mpdx experiment. They use LaB6 as the heating element with a max temperature around 2500k and in the Madison experiment they plan on heating Sodium to a temp much higher than that, like 30k Kelvin. I'm just not sure how that would be achieved?
 
randombill said:
Let's imagine that the heater would only stay on at 2500k. The reason I ask this is because of the experiment at UW call the http://plasma.physics.wisc.edu/viewpage.php?id=mpdx experiment. They use LaB6 as the heating element with a max temperature around 2500k and in the Madison experiment they plan on heating Sodium to a temp much higher than that, like 30k Kelvin. I'm just not sure how that would be achieved?
What do you think would happen with the heating element if you kept it on at 500 W after the temperature in the chamber reached 2500 K?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
What do you think would happen with the heating element if you kept it on at 500 W after the temperature in the chamber reached 2500 K?

Chet
My guess is the heater would stay at whatever temp that's equivalent to 500 w and the gas in the container would start to go above 2500 kelvin, but I'm sort of lost as to how to explain this using only convection; the average electron temps would definitely increase over 2500k.
 
randombill said:
My guess is the heater would stay at whatever temp that's equivalent to 500 w and the gas in the container would start to go above 2500 kelvin, but I'm sort of lost as to how to explain this using only convection; the average electron temps would definitely increase over 2500k.
The first law of thermodynamics tells me that if you keep supplying thermal energy via the heating element (electrical energy being converted to heat), and since the container is rigid so no work is being exchanged with the surroundings, the internal energy of the container contents will keep rising. In order for the heating element to supply heat to the gas, its temperature must be higher than the gas. So, if you keep supplying 500 W to the heating element, its temperature will rise above 2500. (What made you think that it wouldn't?). How much higher its temperature can get before burning out is what needs to be addressed.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
The first law of thermodynamics tells me that if you keep supplying thermal energy via the heating element (electrical energy being converted to heat), and since the container is rigid so no work is being exchanged with the surroundings, the internal energy of the container contents will keep rising. In order for the heating element to supply heat to the gas, its temperature must be higher than the gas. So, if you keep supplying 500 W to the heating element, its temperature will rise above 2500. (What made you think that it wouldn't?). How much higher its temperature can get before burning out is what needs to be addressed.

Chet
I don't disagree with your statement, the last part.

"How much higher its temperature can get before burning out is what needs to be addressed."

Is what I'm confused by simply from the standpoint that the melting point of the heater is 2500 Kelvin, therefore the gas around the element shouldn't ever reach anything above that, yet they're supposedly getting 30k Kelvin just by stirring the plasma? I'm confused now.
 
randombill said:
I don't disagree with your statement, the last part.

"How much higher its temperature can get before burning out is what needs to be addressed."

Is what I'm confused by simply from the standpoint that the melting point of the heater is 2500 Kelvin, therefore the gas around the element shouldn't ever reach anything above that, yet they're supposedly getting 30k Kelvin just by stirring the plasma? I'm confused now.
Well, the heater is not going to be able to do it, so something else must supply the required energy. Maybe viscous heating from the stirring could do the trick, but it might take a long time (if the stirrer is magnetic so that heat couldn't be conducted out along the shaft).

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: randombill

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K