A Lab question antibody recognition

  • Thread starter Thread starter Username55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab
AI Thread Summary
To distinguish different antibodies in a blood sample, one can utilize techniques such as ELISA or Western blotting. Antibodies are present in all bodily fluids, with IgM being the first class produced in response to antigens, while IgD is less common and not well understood. The heavy (H) and light (L) chains of antibodies are linked by disulfide (S-S) bonds, including connections to the J-chain. Chain polymorphism and heterogeneity do not affect antibody specificity. Understanding these aspects is crucial for effective antibody analysis in laboratory settings.
Username55
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Given a sample blood, what would you do to distinguish different antibodies (MGEAD)?
Also, I am curious as to how the H and L chains are formed ? I can't find any clues in my textbook, please help.
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: antibodies can be found in all bodily fluids not only in blood, IgM class is the first one to be made after ImmuneSystem's triggered by antigen's proteins. Not many IgD's are found in the sample fluid and little is known about them although their presence is of essence. Also, H and L link together by S-S bonds, (including too the J-chain). Chain polymorphism as well as heterogeneity has no concerns to antibody specificity.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top