A/m Hysteresis Loop: Wide vs Narrow Differences & Importance

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 5K views
Dash-IQ
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
Wide/Narrow Hysteresis loops, what's the difference?

When calculating the work done to magnetize a ferromagnetic material, calculating the hysteresis loop is the right way?
I know the narrower loop(soft) needs less energy(work) to magnetize or demagnetize it is that true?
That's why it's best to use Soft ferromagnetic materials to minimize losses in energy etc...?

image004.jpg


What is the importance of coercivity? It determines the "area" of the hysteresis loop?
Iron = 160 A/m
samarium-cobalt = 3.2 x 106
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: alihashemi9091
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dash-IQ! :smile:
Dash-IQ said:
When calculating the work done to magnetize a ferromagnetic material, calculating the hysteresis loop is the right way?
I know the narrower loop(soft) needs less energy(work) to magnetize or demagnetize it is that true?
That's why it's best to use Soft ferromagnetic materials to minimize losses in energy etc...?

Yes, the area inside the hysteresis loop shows exactly the amount of the work done in one cycle. :wink:
What is the importance of coercivity? It determines the "area" of the hysteresis loop?
Iron = 160 A/m
samarium-cobalt = 3.2 x 106

I'm not familiar with coercivity … i thought it was just another word for "softness"? :confused:

Can anyone else answer this? o:)
 
i want a b-h curve of a 20kv/400v transformer in maxwell software...any body help me?