A massless, frictionless pulley is suspended from a rigid rod

AI Thread Summary
In the discussed scenario, a massless, frictionless pulley supports two masses, m (50 kg) and M (60 kg), connected by a cord. The force analysis reveals that the net force equation is Mg - mg = (m + M)a, leading to the conclusion that the acceleration of mass m is upward and that of mass M is downward. The acceleration for mass m is calculated as (M - m)g/(M + m), while mass M experiences the same magnitude of acceleration but in the opposite direction. The direction of acceleration is contingent on the defined coordinate system, with the participant defining positive as upward. Thus, mass m accelerates upward while mass M accelerates downward.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
A massless, frictionless pulley is suspended from a rigid rod. Two masses, m (50 kg) and M (60 kg), are suspended on either side of the pulley, respectively, by a light, inextendable cord. Determine the accelerations of the masses.

I drew the force diagrams of both; there is an upward tension force and a downward gravity force in each. Mg - mg = (m + M)a. Now acceleration of block m is (M - m)g/(M + m) upward and block M's acceleration is the same but downward. So does m have a positive acceleration while M has a negative acceleration?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could be either, it depends upon how you define your coordinate system. Is postive up or down?
 
I guess I define positive as going up on the coordinate sys. In the problem, m is pulled up while M goes down.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top