Proving a[n] = Θ(lg n): A Case Study

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Study
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the sequence a[n] is Θ(lg n) under the condition that a[n] is an increasing sequence where a[n] = a[n/m] + d for any divisor m of n. Participants explore the relationship between a[n] and logarithmic growth, with one member successfully demonstrating that a[n] is O(lg n). The challenge remains to establish that a[n] is also Ω(lg n), which is crucial for the Θ notation. Concerns are raised about the implications of the proof when n is odd, highlighting the need for clarity in the reasoning. The conversation reflects a collaborative effort to resolve the proof's complexities.
e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
a[n] = Θ(lg n)!?

Suppose {a[n]} is an increasing sequence and whenever m divides n, then

a[n] = a[n/m] + d

where m is a positive integer and d is a real number. Show that a[n] = Θ(lg n).

a[n/m] + d ≤ a[n/2] + d, and with this I can show that a[n] = O(lg n). All I need to do is show that a[n] = Ω(lg n). This is where I'm stuck. Any hints?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To show that something is in omega(log x), it suffices to find some sequence {x_i} such that a[x_i] grows like log x.

By the way, I'm disconcerted with your reasoning that it is in O(log x); what if n is odd? I suppose you're just abbreviating the complete proof you have.
 
Hurkyl said:
By the way, I'm disconcerted with your reasoning that it is in O(log x); what if n is odd? I suppose you're just abbreviating the complete proof you have.
Sorry. What I meant was

a_n = a_{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor} + d

My head is a total blank. I can't think of anything.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top