Quantum Physics: Can We Understand How It Happens?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qubix
  • Start date Start date
Qubix
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
When you switch from Classical to Quantum Physics, as an undergraduate, there is one more thing you lose, after certainty...you lose intuitive understanding. Ok, we can obtain probability amplitudes for this or that, but is there any chance we will ever know HOW it happens? Could we have a theory that actually describes how an electron absorbs a photon, or how an electron and a positron annihilate, etc? Does it make any sense to ask such a question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll answer with a few quotations from the giants of the subject:

"Those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it." - Niels Bohr in Heisenberg, Werner (1971). Physics and Beyond.

"I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics." - Richard Feynman, from The Character of Physical Law.

As for particular mechanisms, as with all Quantum theory, the mechanism will be described, or perhaps more appropriately, hidden, within equations. Visualisation is, in my opinion, impossible for this level of Physics, as our brains have, quite simply, not evolved to deal with that kind of phenomenon.
 
Qubix said:
When you switch from Classical to Quantum Physics, as an undergraduate, there is one more thing you lose, after certainty...you lose intuitive understanding. Ok, we can obtain probability amplitudes for this or that, but is there any chance we will ever know HOW it happens? Could we have a theory that actually describes how an electron absorbs a photon, or how an electron and a positron annihilate, etc? Does it make any sense to ask such a question?

This question requires speculation, something that we do not allow in this forum.

Zz.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top