A new point of view on freezing point.

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelvin490
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Freezing Point
AI Thread Summary
Homogeneous nucleation in pure water is extremely difficult, preventing freezing above -40°C without impurities. Heterogeneous nucleation, facilitated by impurities, allows water to freeze at 0°C, with the freezing point influenced by impurity levels. The freezing point can be defined as the temperature beyond which additional impurities do not raise the freezing temperature, aligning with the concept of Gibbs free energy equality between liquid and solid phases. Melting and freezing points coincide due to the ease of nucleation in melting, while freezing requires overcoming an energy barrier. Thus, both points are determined by the same thermodynamic principles under constant temperature and pressure.
kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
It is very hard to have homogeneous nucleation in common situation. Pure water with no nuclei at all will not freeze above -40oC. The presence of impurity particles allow the so-called heterogeneous nucleation to occur so that we can see water freeze at 0oC. It may be reasonable to guess at what temperature between -40oC and 0oC will water freeze depends on the amount of impurities in water. But we never see water freeze above 0oC at atmospheric pressure. Can the freezing point be defined in the following way? Freezing point is the temperature at which further increase of impurities cannot increase the temperature for the substance to freeze.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This point (which also corresponds to the melting point) is already defined as the temperature at which the Gibbs free energy of each phase, liquid and solid, is equal. Your definition is a byproduct of this and kinetic theory.
 
Mapes said:
This point (which also corresponds to the melting point) is already defined as the temperature at which the Gibbs free energy of each phase, liquid and solid, is equal. Your definition is a byproduct of this and kinetic theory.

Thanks.But why the melting point coincides with the "maximum" freezing point?
 
Melting and freezing are, of course, two sides of the same coin: a phase transition. Liquids can be supercooled because of the energy barrier associated with nucleating the first bit of solid, as you know; sometimes cooling is necessary to provide the driving force for nucleation.

In contrast, the melting point is relatively constant because there's little or no activation energy involved with melting; nucleation occurs with ease. (An equivalent way of saying this is that for all or nearly all materials, the liquid phase wets the solid phase, so it's not necessary to nucleate a tiny droplet.)

So the melting point and the freezing point are the same, given that there are plenty of nucleation sites for the freezing case, and both values are set by the equivalence of energies for the two phases. Since we're assuming constant temperature and pressure, the energy is specifically the Gibbs free energy.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top