A particle leaves the origin (motion in 2 dimensions)

AI Thread Summary
A particle with an initial velocity of 3.92i m/s and constant acceleration of -1.00i -0.80j m/s² is analyzed to determine its maximum x-coordinate. The maximum x is reached when the x-component of velocity equals zero, which requires solving kinematic equations. The discussion emphasizes splitting motion into x and y components and using the appropriate kinematic formulas to find velocity and position. Integration is mentioned but clarified that kinematics equations can be directly applied without it. Ultimately, the correct approach leads to successfully determining the particle's velocity and position at its maximum x-coordinate.
XxBollWeevilx
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle leaves the origin with an initial velocity v = 3.92i , in m/s. It experiences a constant acceleration
a = -1.00i -0.80j , in m/s2. What is the velocity of the particle when it reaches its maximum x coordinate?

i-component of velocity?

j-component of the velocity?

When does it reach its maximum x coordinate?

Where is the particle at this time? i-component of position?

j-component of position?


Homework Equations


Trying to figure this out...


The Attempt at a Solution



I've been pondering this problem for a while now and I'm stumped. I realize that the object is given an initial velocity in the x direction. Due to its acceleration, it will eventually stop moving altogether. However, I have no clue how the "maximum x" value comes into play, or how I can find it. I'm looking over the kinematics formulas and I can't seem to get them to where I do not have two unknown variables. If anyone could give me a pointer as to how I should approach this problem, I would greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Split the motion into x and y components. It reaches maximum x when x'(t)=0. Use equations like s(t)=s0+v0*t+(1/2)*a*t^2.
 
XxBollWeevilx said:
Due to its acceleration, it will eventually stop moving altogether.

Well, no not in this case. the object starts with a velocity to the right, and is under constant acceleration down and to the left, so it will always be moving even when it is furthest to the left.

XxBollWeevilx said:
However, I have no clue how the "maximum x" value comes into play, or how I can find it. I'm looking over the kinematics formulas and I can't seem to get them to where I do not have two unknown variables. If anyone could give me a pointer as to how I should approach this problem, I would greatly appreciate it.


Forget the formulae. There's only two you need to know for these kinds of problems: \vec{a}=\frac{d}{dt}\vec{v} and \vec{v}=\frac{d}{dt}\vec{r}, where \vec{r} is the object's position vector, \vec{v} is the object's velocity vector, and \vec{a} is the object's acceleration vector. Your object has a constant acceleration vector, an initial velocity vector, and an initial position vector. From there, you can set \vec{a} to a constant and integrate from t = 0 to t to get your velocity vector. Then to find the maximum x value, set the velocity in the x direction to 0 and solve for t.
 
Thank you both, I will try and use your advice to try and solve the problem. I don't understand the integration though...what exactly would I integrate to get the velocity? Velocity is the derivative of position with respect to time, so would the velocity be the integral of acceleration with respect to time? If so, would I integrate the expression a = -1.00i -0.80j?

Thanks so much for the help.
 
I don't think you need to integrate anything. The kinematics equations are already integrated. They are for courses that don't use differential equations. Just use them. Just split the motion into components.
 
Thanks...I ended up getting the correct answers. Here's what I did:

I set the first derivative of the equation you gave (which is essentially the basic formula v=v_0+at to zero to find at which time the maximum x would occur. Then I found the x and y velocity using that same formula but working in the dimensions as you suggested. Then I used the position formula in each dimension r=v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2 to find the position components.

Thanks again for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top