A Particle of Mass m in Infinite 1D State

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a particle of mass m described by a time-dependent wave function in an infinite one-dimensional state. Key points include the need to determine the normalization constant A, the potential energy function U(x) that satisfies the Schrödinger equation, and various quantum-mechanical expectation values such as x, x², momentum, and momentum squared. The original poster expresses confusion about normalization and its application to this specific wave function, indicating a lack of familiarity with the mathematical techniques required. Responses emphasize the importance of understanding the theory behind normalization and encourage a proactive approach to learning. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by students in grasping advanced quantum mechanics concepts.
Cybercole
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Please help. My professor thinks I know this ****.


Ψ(x,t)=Ae^-a(mx^2/η+it)

A particle of mass m is in the infinite, one-dimensional, time-dependent state:

where A and a are positive real constants. What are: (a) normalization constant A, (b) the potential energy function, U(x), which satisfies Schrödinger equation with (x,t) being its eigenfunction, (c) the quantum-mechanical expectation value of x, (d) the quantum-mechanical expectation value of x2, (e) the quantum-mechanical expectation value of momentum ^p, and (f) the quantum-mechanical expectation value ^p2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your thoughts on this ? Start with point a).
 
I honestly don't know where to start. this is the question the teacher gave me.
Can you please help?
 
Well, you can't be absolutely clueless. Pick up your theory notes/book. What does normalization constant mean and how do you find it ? Your attitude's not right. You got to show some willingness, else help is not coming to you.
 
I know how to normalize a funtion but i am getting stuck in the middle of it... we have never normalize somthing like this before all we have ever done was matrices, i am not very strong in this type of math
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top