A possible case of an irreversible process in which total entropy decreases

ticktock
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When a hot stone is dropped into a lake the change in temperature of the lake is negligible, but the stone cools down and so its entropy decreases. Is this therefore a case of an irreversible process in which total entropy decreases?

This isn't for homework but for revision towards my resit. I just can't find anything in my notes which is helping me understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ticktock, welcome to PF. No, this is not an example of total entropy decreasing. The entropy increase in the lake is finite (and greater than the entropy decrease in the stone) even if you consider the temperature increase in the lake to be negligible.
 
When an amount of heat |dQ| moves from the stone to the lake, the decrease in entropy of the stone isdS_\mathrm{stone} = -\frac{|dQ|}{T_\mathrm{stone}} and the increase in entropy of the lake is dS_\mathrm{lake} = \frac{|dQ|}{T_\mathrm{lake}}The total change in entropy is dS = dSlake+dSstone. Given the relative temperature of the lake and stone, what can you say about the sign of dS? Does assuming Tlake is a constant make a difference?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top