Why is the Electric Field in a Conductor Zero After Removing Negative Charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goodboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
goodboy
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
a problem.put a conductor in a electric field .then we konw that in the conductor ,the positive charge will move along with the direction of the electric field,and the negative charge will move along against the direction of the field.then at all point in the conductor ,the external field+the internal field is 0.there is no problem.
but,now if we move the negative charge away(the external field do not change all the time),in this case,the field in the conductor is still 0(i can get this conclusion with Gauss law ).but why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
goodboy said:
a problem.put a conductor in a electric field .then we konw that in the conductor ,the positive charge will move along with the direction of the electric field,and the negative charge will move along against the direction of the field.then at all point in the conductor ,the external field+the internal field is 0.there is no problem.
but,now if we move the negative charge away(the external field do not change all the time),in this case,the field in the conductor is still 0(i can get this conclusion with Gauss law ).but why?
If you remove a negative charge from a neutral conductor it becomes a charged conductor.

The field in the conductor is 0 because if it was not, the free charges in the conductor would move (opposite to the direction of the field) until the field became 0.

AM
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top