A problem on rotational mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem in rotational mechanics involving the relationships between tangential acceleration, angular acceleration, velocity, and angular velocity. The original poster questions whether algebraic theorems of ratios and proportions can be applied to these relationships. A participant suggests that while the relationships hold true, considering them as vectors reveals that they are orthogonal and form the sides of a right triangle. This perspective indicates that the magnitudes of the vectors conform to the necessary relationships. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of the concepts involved in rotational mechanics and their vector representations.
harini_5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm actually working on a problem in Rotational mechanics.
I'll just hint the problem.
In a rotating body,tangential acc=(radius)angular acceleration.
velocity=(radius)angular velocity.thus,
[tangential acc/angular acceleration]
=[velocity/angular velocity]
can we use the theorems of ratio and proportions studied in algebra so as to write,
[tangential acc+angular acceleration]/[tangential acc-angular acceleration]
=[velocity+angular velocity]/[velocity-angular velocity]

this was a q asked in my exam.
still I have no idea whether my answer,Yes.we shall write is correct or wrong
if u feel the answer is no please justify.even if u feel yes,please give me an explanation.
thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if a/b = x/y

and (a + x) / (a - x) = (b + y) / (b - y)

then ... what's the problem?
 
is this possible with vectors also.
my teacher is no ordinary.the probs he would give us would look ordinary,but the concept they reveal would be extra-ordinary...
 
harini_5 said:
is this possible with vectors also.
my teacher is no ordinary.the probs he would give us would look ordinary,but the concept they reveal would be extra-ordinary...

I hadn't thought to consider it as vectors, but as vectors they are orthogonal and hence are sides of a right triangle. Since you are comparing similar resultants, their magnitudes conform with the relationship anyway.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top