A proof that |R| < C

  • Thread starter Doron Shadmi
  • Start date
Integral
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,184
55
No,Doron, I will not bother reading your paper. You do not understand the basics of Real Analysis, you have demonstrated over and over that your methods lead to fallacious results. Why should I spend time learning about your errors when you will not but any effort into learning about Real Analysis. If you understood the topology of the real line and how Mathematicians have PROVEN that it is dense we would not have this conversation.

Yes, I said, MATHEMATICIANS HAVE PROVEN THAT THE REAL LINE IS DENSE. This is with sound logic and basic set theory. You employ neither. Your results are assumed and fallacious.
 
Tom Mattson
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,474
20
Originally posted by Integral
Were it within my powers, I would move this thread to the Theory Development.
I agree, and since Ahrkron is not around I am going to go ahead and move it.
 

Related Threads for: A proof that |R| < C

Replies
6
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
25K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Top