A Question about Chromatography

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalladin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chromatography
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancy between an experimentally determined total exchange capacity of 2.74 meq/g for a resin column and the manufacturer's specification of 3.4 meq/g. Participants clarify that "meq" stands for milliequivalents, a measure of ionic concentration relevant in ion exchange chromatography. One contributor explains that meq indicates the amount of ion bound to the resin and emphasizes that variations in experimental results could arise from factors such as the number of replicates conducted. The potential compromise of surface area when the resin is packed in a column is also suggested as a reason for the difference in values. The conversation hints at the possibility of seeking further insights from a chemistry-focused forum for more specialized guidance.
kalladin
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
I calculated the total exchange capacity of a column per gram of dry weight of resin to be 2.74 meq/g. This value comes from experimental values. However, the manufacturer's specifications for the number of exchange sites is 3.4 meq/g.

1. What's meq? :blushing: I know this means milliequivalents of the anion/cation, but what does it mean? I think I'm contradicting myself by asking the question, but please help out to clarify if you can.

2. Why would there be such a big difference between the experimentally determined number of exchange sites and the manufacturer's specifications? I suspect that when the resin is packed in a column some surface area is compromised?

Please help me out here :smile:

Thanks,

K.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I'm not all that familiar with ion exchange chromatography, but I did some work with HPLC and GC and I think I can help. Classically, Meq provides the concentration of a substance, that is in ionic form, in solution, or more likely in this case the amount of ion bound to resin. Solutions of non-ionic sunstances should not be expressed in this manner. Thus if a solution contains 20 ppm of magnesium then the meq would be 1.67 (20/24 gives moles of solute, multiply by 2 for valence= 1.67). In many cases where the valence is one, the Meq equals a molarity based concentration. Does this answer your question?

To get to your difference between your's and the manufacturer's value, since this is an experimentally derived number, how many times did you do the experiment? Perhaps there is a considerable variation and with a larger number of replicates you would approach the reported number.

If this hasn't helped perhaps the Chemistry board would provide better results.
 
I agree, this would probably get a better answer on the Chemistry board. Hopefully one of the mentors will kindly oblige us and move the thread. :smile:
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top