A question about Feynman's book of Path. integrals

aife
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Page 35 Feynman Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals
(2-26)ψ=(iε)R

I know it's a defination.But how to find some threads.How can we get this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello aife, maybe you have to give some more information about the matter, otherwise those who don't have the book won't be able to help you.Sergio
 
Thanks for your advice.
Here's the quote:
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    36.2 KB · Views: 482
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top