A question about kaon masses and decay widths

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qubix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Kaon
Qubix
Messages
82
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Ok, so I need to make a software that will simulate a neutral kaon system, and I only have the following data about the masses and decay widths:

gammaS = 580*gammaL {S = short lived state, L = long lived state}

mS - mL = 0.477*gammaS


Homework Equations



How to implement these numerically in a program? (i.e. what values to give each of the four terms)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried

gammaS = 580
gammaL = 1
mS = 277.6
mL = 1

doesn't work :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by

"
I tried

gammaS = 580
gammaL = 1
mS = 277.6
mL = 1
" ?

What do you mean by " doesn't work :(" ?

You haven't really told us anything...
 
I need to parametrize these values in order to verify a bell inequality, and the result that I get is not ok. This was my question, how can I parametrize these 4 values with the information above, because it seems that only the mL-mS difference is measured, but I haven't found mS and mL themselves.
 
mL and mS are the Kaon mass.
 
Dauto, I know they represent the masses of the short and long lived states. The problem is I cannot find their numerical values anywhere, only their difference. Does anyone know what are the specific values of ms and ml?

L.E. Ok , so I managed to solve it and it works. Topic can be closed.
 
Last edited:
In the future if you need data on any particles a good place to look is the particle data group (PDG) website
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top