A question about wave motion and beat frequency

In summary: The highest peaks occur, of course, when the individual waves come most closely into phase. With two pure sine waves, one with period 2 and one with period 3 (whatever time units), if they are perfectly in phase at time 0, when will they next be perfectly in phase?If you do not know what "beat frequency" means, what hope do you have of calculating it?
  • #36
haruspex said:
That is demonstrably false. The pattern I posted repeats every 1 second ( which you can prove using the LCM of the three periods 1/3, 1/4, 1/7 of the three pairwise beat frequencies). Within that, you can see there are 7 more-or-less evenly spaced bulges each second, so you could make a case for the answer 7. One bulge is a lot smaller than the other 6, but if we discount that then the spacing becomes rather uneven, so no longer qualifies as a "beat".
Yes even I was thinking the same. It could be one 1 which is more convincing :/ may be the answer key is wrong.let me clear this one last thing.i just want to mark this question solved..It's.there for a long time [emoji39] let's say there are three waves with frequencies (sorry again) n+1,n,n-1 the beat frequency of the three waves will be 2 (by taking LCM ) right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
harini07 said:
Yes even I was thinking the same. It could be one 1 which is more convincing :/ may be the answer key is wrong.let me clear this one last thing.i just want to mark this question solved..It's.there for a long time [emoji39] let's say there are three waves with frequencies (sorry again) n+1,n,n-1 the beat frequency of the three waves will be 2 (by taking LCM ) right?
No, you keep taking LCMs of frequencies. If the LCM is relevant at all, it's the LCM of the periods.
 
  • #38
haruspex said:
No, you keep taking LCMs of frequencies. If the LCM is relevant at all, it's the LCM of the periods.
woah! yes, i was! but say th
haruspex said:
No, you keep taking LCMs of frequencies. If the LCM is relevant at all, it's the LCM of the periods.
yes sorry :/ so the LCM of their time period would be 1. so beat frequency is 1 ?
 
  • #39
harini07 said:
woah! yes, i was! but say th

yes sorry :/ so the LCM of their time period would be 1. so beat frequency is 1 ?
As I wrote in post 35, you can use the LCMs of the three pairwise beat frequencies to show that the pattern repeats after 1 second, but that is not the same as saying it has a beat frequency of 1 second. Beats are perceptual. If you were to hear the pattern of pulses depicted in post #33, I don't think you'd say it had a beat frequency of 1 second.
 
  • Like
Likes harini07
  • #40
1485977295357.jpg
I've included the key that my textbook has given for this question.do look at that if it makes any sense :/ also I guess that's what you have told I.e. dividing the time period into smaller chunks it one gets the Maxima.see where I flawed. I'm being forced to give up on this question :(
 
  • #41
harini07 said:
View attachment 112390 I've included the key that my textbook has given for this question.do look at that if it makes any sense :/ also I guess that's what you have told I.e. dividing the time period into smaller chunks it one gets the Maxima.see where I flawed. I'm being forced to give up on this question :(
Interesting.
As you can see from the image I posted at #33, the book answer is simply wrong. The question is why.
First, as I wrote at the outset, we need a definition of a beat. Originally it was certainly a matter of perception, and implied a regular pulse of sound. In the usual treatment of two waves, that is what you get. But three waves will not give a nice regular pulse.
The book appears to be defining it as the rate of local peaks in the combination of the three pairwise beats. From a theoretical perspective that feels odd. Why should it be broken into those two stages? We could more reasonably ask how many peaks there are in the amplitude altogether, but then we would answer 200x203x207.
From an auditory perspective it fails because some of these 11 (not 12) overlap so significantly you would not hear them as separate.
 
  • Like
Likes harini07
  • #42
haruspex said:
Interesting.
As you can see from the image I posted at #33, the book answer is simply wrong. The question is why.
First, as I wrote at the outset, we need a definition of a beat. Originally it was certainly a matter of perception, and implied a regular pulse of sound. In the usual treatment of two waves, that is what you get. But three waves will not give a nice regular pulse.
The book appears to be defining it as the rate of local peaks in the combination of the three pairwise beats. From a theoretical perspective that feels odd. Why should it be broken into those two stages? We could more reasonably ask how many peaks there are in the amplitude altogether, but then we would answer 200x203x207.
From an auditory perspective it fails because some of these 11 (not 12) overlap so significantly you would not hear them as separate.
yeah, 11 of them overlap. so you say questions like this can be never answered just by taking some theoretical assumptions? so there is no regular pulse which can be the ultimate answer to this question but simply there are set of pulses that get repeated over the period of time, right?
 
  • #43
harini07 said:
11 of them overlap.
Well, post #33 shows, arguably, 7 pulses each second, so not all 11 overlap with others.
harini07 said:
there is no regular pulse which can be the ultimate answer to this question but simply there are set of pulses that get repeated over the period of time, right?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes harini07
  • #44
haruspex said:
Well, post #33 shows, arguably, 7 pulses each second, so not all 11 overlap with others.

Right.
FINALLY, :D thanks for the help @haruspex you are an awesome teacher (no flattering, my teacher got infuriated with me for this question and simply asked me to follow that flawed answer key). i will mark it solved ;)
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
<h2>1. What is wave motion?</h2><p>Wave motion is the transfer of energy through a medium by the periodic oscillation of particles or disturbances. This can occur in various forms, such as sound waves, water waves, and electromagnetic waves.</p><h2>2. What is the frequency of a wave?</h2><p>The frequency of a wave is the number of complete cycles or oscillations that occur in one second. It is measured in Hertz (Hz) and is inversely proportional to the wavelength of the wave.</p><h2>3. What is the beat frequency?</h2><p>The beat frequency is the difference between the frequencies of two waves that are interfering with each other. It can be calculated by subtracting the lower frequency from the higher frequency.</p><h2>4. How is beat frequency related to wave interference?</h2><p>Beat frequency is a result of wave interference, which occurs when two or more waves overlap and combine. The resulting beat frequency is the difference between the frequencies of the two interfering waves.</p><h2>5. How can beat frequency be used in real-life applications?</h2><p>Beat frequency is commonly used in musical instruments, such as tuning a guitar or piano. It is also used in radio communication to tune in to specific frequencies and in medical imaging to create images of internal body structures.</p>

1. What is wave motion?

Wave motion is the transfer of energy through a medium by the periodic oscillation of particles or disturbances. This can occur in various forms, such as sound waves, water waves, and electromagnetic waves.

2. What is the frequency of a wave?

The frequency of a wave is the number of complete cycles or oscillations that occur in one second. It is measured in Hertz (Hz) and is inversely proportional to the wavelength of the wave.

3. What is the beat frequency?

The beat frequency is the difference between the frequencies of two waves that are interfering with each other. It can be calculated by subtracting the lower frequency from the higher frequency.

4. How is beat frequency related to wave interference?

Beat frequency is a result of wave interference, which occurs when two or more waves overlap and combine. The resulting beat frequency is the difference between the frequencies of the two interfering waves.

5. How can beat frequency be used in real-life applications?

Beat frequency is commonly used in musical instruments, such as tuning a guitar or piano. It is also used in radio communication to tune in to specific frequencies and in medical imaging to create images of internal body structures.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
921
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top