MHB A question on asymptotic expansion for erf function.

Alone
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I've got the next question which I just want to see if I got it right, and if not then do correct me.

we have [math]erf(x)=\frac{2}{\sqrt \pi} \int_{0}^{x} e^{-t^2} dt[/math]

and I want to find an asymptotic expansion of this function when [math]x\rightarrow \infty[/math].

So here's what I have done:

[math]erf(x)=\frac{2}{\sqrt \pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-t^2}dt - \int_{x}^{\infty} e^{-t^2} dt = 1 +\int_{\frac{1}{x}}^{0} e^{-\frac{1}{\xi ^2}}\frac{d\xi}{\xi ^2}[/math]

where in my last step I used the next change of variables: [math]\xi=\frac{1}{t}[/math].
Now, I am kind of stuck here, I mean [math]\xi[/math] is smaller than [math]\frac{1}{x}\rightarrow 0[/math], but I cannot expand [math]e^{-\frac{1}{\xi ^2}}[/math] with a power seris in [math]\frac{1}{\xi^2}[/math] so what to do now?

Thanks (the question appears in Murray's asymptotic anaysis page 27, question 2).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top