A question on determine the rate of formation (chemistry)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the rate of formation of product B from the reaction A-->2B+C using concentration data over time. One user initially determines the reaction to be first order and calculates the concentration of B at 28 minutes, obtaining a rate constant (k) of approximately 0.0105. However, they express uncertainty about their answer being correct. Another user reports a different k value of 0.034 and a concentration of B at 35 minutes as 0.24M, indicating confusion about their calculations as well. The thread highlights the challenges in determining accurate reaction rates and the need for clarification on the calculations involved.
Kudo Shinichi
Messages
104
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


For the reaction A-->2B+C, the following data are obtained for [A] as a function of time: t=0min, [A]=0.80M; 8min, 0.60M; 24min, 0.35M; 40min, 0.20M.
Calculate the rate of formation of B at t= 28 min.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have found out that this equation is a first order reaction with equation: y=-0.0345145x-0.2270455
then I plug in the time 28 min into x in this equation and I got the ln=-1.1934515
=exp(-1.1934515)=0.3031730544
the rate for first order of reaction is k* (k=-slope), which is equal to 0.01046386638

I am wondering did I do the problem correctly? because I was told that it is a wrong answer.
any comment or help would be great. Thank you very much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for bumping this, but I am also having the same problem as the OP. I found the k value to be 3.4×10^-2 and the at that time (which is 35 minutes in my case) to be .24M . I am not sure what I am doing wrong, any help would be great.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top