Keyser
- 6
- 0
hey all,
i've recently started studying electrostatics, and i have couple of question about things that i did not fully understand, and would very much appreciate if someone could set me straight.
1) how can a cube, with a single charge in the middle of it have a flux? don't the field lines cancel each other, thus achieving 0 electric field for each plane? i mean, you have a field vector going up on the Y axis, and down on the same axis (and so on for the others), so how come the flux \Phi=A\overline{E} isn't zero?
2) if i have a flat disk on a plane, with uniform charge density \sigma, why when i integrate, i do so for small rings, and not for very small circles? why is it: E=\int\frac{kσ2∏rdr}{(...)} instead of E=\int\frac{kσ2∏dr}{(...)}?
thank you very much for your help
i've recently started studying electrostatics, and i have couple of question about things that i did not fully understand, and would very much appreciate if someone could set me straight.
1) how can a cube, with a single charge in the middle of it have a flux? don't the field lines cancel each other, thus achieving 0 electric field for each plane? i mean, you have a field vector going up on the Y axis, and down on the same axis (and so on for the others), so how come the flux \Phi=A\overline{E} isn't zero?
2) if i have a flat disk on a plane, with uniform charge density \sigma, why when i integrate, i do so for small rings, and not for very small circles? why is it: E=\int\frac{kσ2∏rdr}{(...)} instead of E=\int\frac{kσ2∏dr}{(...)}?
thank you very much for your help