A Question on Semantics Regarding Group Theory

Mindstein
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is the set of a single element {e} with the multiplication law ee = e a group?

Homework Equations


none.

The Attempt at a Solution


Yes, it is a group. But that is not my question. My question is how do you ask the question? If I were face to face with you and wanted to ask you the question, would I say, "Is the set of a single element e with the multiplication law e multiplied by ANOTHER e (another element in the group) equivalent to the identity element?"

Also, if I am wrong about it being a group...who cares. If I get the semantics down first, I will better understand what the problem is asking.

Thanks everyone!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Mindstein.
I am not sure I get your question.
{e} is a group (for say, multiplication) IF e is the neutral element (or identity).
for any group whose neutral element is e, {e} is (with the group itself) the trivial subgroup.
What do you mean 'another e' ?
If you are thinking that you can take any element of the original group and take put it in a sngleton and wonder if this singleton is also a group, than the answer is no. it's only valid for e.
for instance, take (N, +), 0 is its 'e', so {0} is a group, but {1} is not since 1+1 does not belong to {1}
sorry if I didn't get your question

cheers...
 
Hi Mindstein! :smile:
Mindstein said:
Is the set of a single element {e} with the multiplication law ee = e a group?

Yes.

If you're worried that you can't pick two e's in S, it doesn't matter …

the law about multiplication is defined on S x S, not on S itself (where S is the set),

and (e,e) is an element of S x S :wink:
 
Thanks tiny-tim and oli4, you all sure do know how to get a brother past his problems!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top