A Quick Question on Compton Scattering

j-e_c
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. A photon of wavelength 1.000nm is scattered by a muon initially at rest. What is the deflection angle of the photon if its wavelength after scattering is 1.001nm?

Homework Equations



\lambda^{'} - \lambda = \frac{h}{mc} (1 - cos(\vartheta)

Assume that the mass of the muon is 200 times that of an electron.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have got down to cos(\vartheta) = -81.4. I'm not sure what to do now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
j-e_c said:
I have got down to cos(\vartheta) = -81.4.
That's not good. Getting |cosθ| > 1 is a sure sign that you've made an error somewhere.

Redo your calculation. (Show what you plugged in where.)
 
Thanks for the quick reply.

Note - I'm going to change theta to x so I can avoid LaTeX complications. Similarly, I'm going to change lambda to a and lambda-prime to b.

First, I rearranged the equation to make cos(x) the subject:

(b - a) = h/mc (1 - cos(x))

(b - a)mc/h = 1 - cos(x)

1 - [(b - a)mc/h] = cos(x)

Now, I'll show you how the value came about:

b - a = (1.001 - 1.000)x10^-9
= 1.000x10^-12 (1)

mc/h = (200 x 9.11x10^-31 x 3x10^8) / (6.63x10^-34) = 8.244x10^13 (2)

Multiplying (1) and (2) I get 82.44

Then 1 - 82.44 = -81.44

Therefore cos(x) = -81.44
 
Your calculation looks OK to me. That tells us that the assumptions of the problem are not consistent with Compton scattering. You can't have the given change in wavelength when scattering off of a muon! (Either that's a trick question or I'm missing something basic. :rolleyes: I'll think about it.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top