A Rotation with Translation Movement is standalone natural phenomenon.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of rotation with translation movement as a standalone natural phenomenon, asserting that it requires its own law of momentum conservation. The author conducted three experiments using two pencils and a rubber band, demonstrating that pencils with rotation exhibit lower velocity than those without. The author claims the simulator used in the experiments is incorrect, emphasizing that angular momentum is conserved when considering the total angular momentum of the system. The findings challenge traditional views in classical mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with angular momentum concepts
  • Basic knowledge of experimental physics
  • Experience with simulation tools in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the laws of momentum conservation in various physical systems
  • Explore the implications of rotation with translation movement in classical mechanics
  • Learn about torque and its effects on angular momentum
  • Investigate simulation tools for modeling physical experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in classical mechanics and the nuances of momentum conservation in rotational dynamics.

abv_
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Please look into this site
http://knol.google.com/k/alex-belov/paradox-of-classical-mechanics-2/1xmqm1l0s4ys/9#


The experiment 2 animations

This is animation based on classical mechnics laws
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze27vxm/sim.gif



This is animation based on theory of standalone rotation with translation movement.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze27vxm/movie2.gif



The Natural Experiment 2.

I made 3 successful experiments with 2 pencils.
On all these experiments pencils with rotation movement have lower velocity than pencils without rotation.

The theory is CORRECT.
The simulator is WRONG.

Materilas:
2 pencils and thin rubberband 3.5'' from Staples store.

The rubberband is repulsing 2 objects(2 pencils). Two their parts have opposite velocities to each other. After initial action the rubberband has velocity zero. The rubberband mass much less then pencil mass.

Here is some snapshots which shows experiment dynamic.
http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/1xmqm1l0s4ys/h6o9ht/1%20(1).jpg
http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/1xmqm1l0s4ys/h6o9ht/2%20(1).jpg
http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/1xmqm1l0s4ys/h6o9ht/3%20(1).jpg
http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/1xmqm1l0s4ys/h6o9ht/4%20(1).jpg

The rotation with translation movement is standalone natural phenomenon. It should have it's own law of momentum conservation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
abv_ said:
Please look into this site
http://knol.google.com/k/alex-belov/paradox-of-classical-mechanics-2/1xmqm1l0s4ys/9#
In your second example, you make the claim that angular momentum is not conserved. That's incorrect. All you've shown is that the angular momentum of each object about its own center of mass is not conserved. Nothing wrong with that. One object receives a torque about its center of mass, while the other doesn't.

If you calculate the total angular momentum of the system, you'll see that angular momentum is conserved. (When you calculate the total angular momentum of each object, use the same reference point and don't neglect the angular momentum due to the motion of the center of mass.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K