A Sinusodial wave is propagating

  • Thread starter Thread starter Firben
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a sinusoidal wave propagating along a stretched string, with specific focus on its properties such as amplitude, period, wavelength, and wave speed. Participants are analyzing the implications of wave direction on these properties based on provided graphs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the amplitude and period of the wave, with some questioning the implications of the wave's direction on its speed and wavelength. There is a focus on how to calculate wave speed based on time intervals and distances observed in the graphs.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided calculations for amplitude and period, while others are exploring methods to determine wave speed. There is ongoing clarification regarding the relationship between wave properties and their directional movement, with no consensus reached yet on the final calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with a graph that depicts wave displacement over time at two different positions along the string. There are mentions of potential errors in unit conversions and calculations, as well as the need to clarify the timing of wave peaks for accurate speed determination.

Firben
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
A sinusoidal wave is propagating along a stretched string that lies along the x-axis. The displacement of the string as a function of time is graphed in the figure (attachment) for particles at x=0m and x=0.0900m.

A) What is the amplitude of the wave? (solved)
B) What is the period of the wave? (solved)
C) You are told that the two points x=0 an x=0.09m are within one wavelength of each other. If the wave is moving in the +x-direction, determine the wavelength and wave speed. (solved)

If the wave is moving in the -x-direction, determine the wavelength and wave speed. What should i do here ?


http://s716.photobucket.com/albums/...rent=5508afb2-b0b2-404b-aa14-09f9c8e37e4a.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Exactly the same as before except the velocity is the other way.
What difference does the direction the wave travels make?
 
Yes, but how can it be 6.0 m/s?
Thats is what's stands in the answer sheet
 
Last edited:
Answer for C) v=0.04s*0.090m=3.6*10^-3 mm/s
 
v=0.04s*0.090m=3.6*10^-3 mm/s
this cannot possibly be correct
- when you changed units from m to mm you forgot to multiply by 1000
- you cannot get length/time from multiplying a length and a time.
... try again.

show me how you worked out A, B, and C - what is your reasoning?
 
A) A=4mm
B) T=0.040s (red wave)
C) it should be 3.6 m/s
What should i do to find v?
 
Last edited:
Pick a peak on the x=0 wave and, from the diagram, figure out how long it takes to reach x=0.090 m. The speed of the wave will then be the distance that point traveled, 0.090 m, divided by the time it took to get there.
 
Wot he said - easier to find a place where y=0, but you also need the same slope.
You just need the position of the wave at two different times.
speed is distance over time :)

To be clear - and because this is not always taught:

An if arbitrary distortion of the string is: y=f(x)
If it propagates to the right (+x) direction at speed v, then the equation becomes y(x,t)=f(x-vt)

In this case f(x)=Asin(kx): k=2π/λ ...(k has the effect of turning the distance x into an angle)

Therefore: y(x,t)=Asin[k(x-vt)]=Asin(kx-ωt). You can rewrite this in terms of λ and v - it will be more useful to this problem that way.

In your case this translates into the time-waves at two different x's: y(0,t) and y(0.0900,t) ... which are the red and blue lines respectively.

generally: y(x,t)= 4.sin(kx-2πt/0.04)

so: y(0,t)=-4sin(2πt/0.04) and y(0.09,t)=4.sin(0.09k - 2πt/0.04)

it is a good idea to keep the pi's separate for as long as you can.
you can use the graph to solve for k in the second one and so get the wavelength.
and get the speed from v=fλ ... but it is easier to do distance over time from the graph.

changing the direction of travel is a matter of changing the sign of v in the derivation.
 
Last edited:
0.09k=2pi*t/0.04
What is the value of t?
 
  • #10
woah: where did that come from?
Is this still the same problem?
Did you try out post #7 first?
 
  • #11
Yes. How can i find the spped from the graph ?
 
  • #12
The two graphs show you the height-vs-time of different positions on the string.
These graphs are due to a wave f(x) moving in the x direction.
So we needs some way to find out how long it takes f(x) to move a fixed distance.
The distance we have is 0.09m - all the points in f(x) move at the same speed, so we just need to know the time one point in f(x) crosses x=0, and the time the same point in f(x) crosses x=0.09. An easy to identify point is when f(x) is a maximum.

So look at the time when the x=x0=0 graph first reaches maximum - record that at t0
Then look for the time the x=x1=0.09m graph first reaches it's maximum - record it as t1
t1-t0 is how long it took for f(x) to move from x0 to x1.
Now you have a distance, and the time it took to travel that distance - you can find the speed.

(Note: you don't have to use peaks - I used the points when the graph crosses from -y to +y - easier to pinpoint but also easier to stuff up.)

The method in post #8 involves two simultaneous equations and two unknowns.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
30K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K