A sled is being pulled accross horizontal, snow covered ground

  • Thread starter Thread starter smaan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground Horizontal
AI Thread Summary
A 16-kg sled is pulled across snow by a 24 N force, reaching 2.0 m/s over 8.0 m. The sled's acceleration was calculated to be 0.25 m/s², and the normal force is 156.96 N. To find the coefficient of kinetic friction, the net force must be determined, taking into account both the pulling force and the frictional force. The frictional force can be calculated using Newton's second law, where the net force equals the mass times acceleration. The correct approach will yield the coefficient of kinetic friction once the friction force is accurately calculated.
smaan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 16-kg sled is being pulled along the horizontal snow-covered
ground by a horizontal force of 24 N. Starting from rest, the sled attains
a speed of 2.0 m/s in 8.0 m. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction
between the runners of the sled and the snow.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have found the acceleration of the sled by using the v^2 = v0+2ax. So, 2^2 = 2(a)(8), which gives me 0.25 m/s^2. I also calculated the normal force. Since it is a horizontal plane, it would be (9.81)(16) = 156.96 N.

Not to sure how to get the μFk from here.

Thank you for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How might you find the friction force acting on the sled? (Hint: Newton's 2nd law.)
 
smaan said:

Homework Statement



A 16-kg sled is being pulled along the horizontal snow-covered
ground by a horizontal force of 24 N. Starting from rest, the sled attains
a speed of 2.0 m/s in 8.0 m. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction
between the runners of the sled and the snow.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have found the acceleration of the sled by using the v^2 = v0+2ax. So, 2^2 = 2(a)(8), which gives me 0.25 m/s^2. I also calculated the normal force. Since it is a horizontal plane, it would be (9.81)(16) = 156.96 N.

Not to sure how to get the μFk from here.

Thank you for your time

If that is indeed the acceleration [I don't doubt you - I have just not checked your answer] you should know the net force, and thus how large the friction that opposes the applied 24N force.
Once you have the size of the friction force, you should be able to calculate the coefficient of friction, since you have the normal force.
 
Doc Al said:
How might you find the friction force acting on the sled? (Hint: Newton's 2nd law.)

Would the frictional force be F=ma? So would F=(16kg)(0.25m/s^2)=4N?

So then, μk=Fk/FN. So, since I found the normal force to be 156.96 N, the kinetic friction coefficient would be 4/156.96 = 0.022548?
 
smaan said:
Would the frictional force be F=ma? So would F=(16kg)(0.25m/s^2)=4N?

So then, μk=Fk/FN. So, since I found the normal force to be 156.96 N, the kinetic friction coefficient would be 4/156.96 = 0.022548?

Newtons second law, using the actual acceleration, gives you the net Force acting.
The applied Force plus the Friction Force [adding as vectors of course] give the net Force.

The answer you give here is not correct.
 
smaan said:
Would the frictional force be F=ma? So would F=(16kg)(0.25m/s^2)=4N?
No. When you use F = ma, remember that F is the net force. So it's better to write it as: ƩF = ma.

There are two horizontal forces acting: The pulling force and the friction force. Set up an equation and solve for the friction force.

So then, μk=Fk/FN. So, since I found the normal force to be 156.96 N, the kinetic friction coefficient would be 4/156.96 = 0.022548?
Once you solve for the correct friction force, then this method will give you μk.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top