A solution of Euler's equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter coverband
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler's equation
coverband
Messages
170
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The velocity vector for a flow is u = (xt, yt, -2zt). Given that the density is constant and that the body force is F = (0,0,-g) find the pressure, P(x,t) in the fluid which satisfies P = P_0(t) at x = 0


Homework Equations


Euler's equation: \frac{Du}{Dt}=-\frac{1}{\rho}\nabla P + F


The Attempt at a Solution



\nabla P = \rho(-x-xt^2, -y - yt^2, 2z - 4zt^2 - g)
How do you get P from this. Back of the book gives
P = - \frac {1}{2} \rho (x^2+y^2)(1+t^2) + \rho z^2(1-2t^2)-\rho gz + P_0(t)
How did they get that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coverband said:
\nabla P = \rho(-x-xt^2, -y - yt^2, 2z - 4zt^2 - g)
How do you get P from this. Back of the book gives
What do you understand by the del operator? You simply have to solve a set of three partial differential equations to reconstruct P.
 
More specifically, you have
\frac{\partial P}{\partial x}= \rho(x- xt^2)= \rho(1- t^2)x
\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}= \rho(y- yt^2)= \rho(1- t^2)y
and
\frac{\partial P}{\partial z}= \rho(z- zt^2)= \rho(1- t^2)z

Which can be treated as three ordinary differential equations with 't' as a fixed parameter.
 
The arbitrary function of t comes into play as you're doing a partial integration, so when you take the gradient again, all functions of t get knocked out as you're doing partial differentiation.
 
Fightfish said:
What do you understand by the del operator? You simply have to solve a set of three partial differential equations to reconstruct P.

Thanks I was getting delta mixed up with nabla!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top