A spring loaded gun question from my test.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krislynn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gun Spring Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a spring-loaded gun that fires a mass. The mass of 0.16 kg is launched with an elastic potential energy of 0.85 J after being compressed 0.10 m. Participants suggest using energy conservation principles, equating the spring's potential energy to gravitational potential energy at maximum height. The key formula to use is E = mgh, which simplifies the calculation of height. The conversation highlights different approaches to solving the problem, emphasizing the conversion of energy types.
Krislynn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A spring loaded gun question from my test. Please Help!

Homework Statement


Suppose a .16kg mass on a spring loaded gun that has been compressed .10 m has elastic potential energy of .85 J. How high above the spring's equilibrium point can the gun fire the mass if the mass is fired straight into the air?


Homework Equations


I am not even sure which equations to use!


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


Welcome to PF, Krislynn.
The question is about energy. You are given the energy stored in the spring, so you must look up the formula for that. The spring energy is converted to the kind of energy the mass has when it is at its maximum height. You will need the formula for that kind of energy, too. The energy is entirely converted from one form to another, so you just put an equal sign between the two energy formulas, put in the numbers you know and solve for the height.
 


Thank you so much!
 


Most welcome! I now see you didn't need the spring energy formula because the energy was given. Just E = mgh should solve it.
 


or if you feel like doing it the really clunky and obtuse way (what I did for some reason), .85=(mv^2)/2 solve for v and then its a really easy kinematics problem
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top