A thrustless propulsion device Help me out

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anticitizen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Device Propulsion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a thrustless propulsion device featuring two parallel, skewed rings with spinning balls inside, initially built by an individual in their garage. The device reportedly moved across the floor when powered, utilizing a motor and a spinning disc to propel the balls. Participants clarify that true reactionless propulsion does not exist, and similar devices rely on uneven static friction rather than genuine thrust. The term "thrustless" is acknowledged as more appropriate than "reactionless" in this context. The conversation highlights skepticism about the feasibility of such propulsion concepts in physics.
Anticitizen
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
About a decade or so ago, I came across a website that featured a reactionless drive some guy built in his garage. My google-fu is weak, and I can't seem to find any info on it on the net anymore, and was hoping someone knew something about it. It worked as follows:

There are two rings, set parallel to each other, but skewed slightly. There is a ball (or series of balls) that spin around inside the ring.

Here is my crappy paintbrush representation:

device.JPG


The rig he built had pool balls, I believe, propelled by a motor with a spinning disc located in the center that hit each ball and sent it spinning around the rings at high speed.

(It had another 'retainer ring' to keep the balls from falling out as well.)

He had the whole rig set up on wheels.

There were videos on the site showing the thing scooting across the floor when powered on, dragging an extension cord behind it.

To the best of my memory, this is how it worked:

The ball, when approaching the narrow end of the rings, would spin faster than it would at the other end. Due to some quirk of conservation of momentum, it would carry momentum in that direction (the narrow end) causing the whole rig to move in that direction. Or maybe it moved in the opposite direction, I can't recall.

Does anybody know what I'm talking about, or otherwise can help me address the physics involved here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no such thing as reactionless propulsion. Devices such as the one you mention work by unevenly harnessing static friction and hopping up and down.

Also, reactionless propulsion is a crackpot subject and therefore not something we discuss here.
 
I shouldn't have said reactionless. Thrustless, as used in the thread topic, was the correct term.
 

Similar threads

2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Back
Top