A triangle's rotational kinetic energy problem

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the rotational kinetic energy of a triangle formed by three 300 g masses connected by rigid rods, rotating at 8.00 revolutions per second about its center. The initial calculations incorrectly determined the radius of rotation as 0.173 m, which was based on the height of the triangle rather than the correct distance from the center to the masses. The correct radius should reflect the distance from the axis of rotation to the masses, which needs to be reassessed. The moment of inertia and subsequent kinetic energy calculations depend on this accurate radius. A reevaluation of the triangle's geometry is necessary to resolve the issue.
Nadialy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The three 300 g masses in the figure are connected by massless, rigid rods to form a triangle.
knight_Figure_13_29.jpg


What is the triangle's rotational kinetic energy if it rotates at 8.00 revolutions per s about an axis through the center?

Values given:
Mass of each ball at the corner of the triangle: 0.3 kg
Sides of Equilateral Triangle: 0.4m
It is rotating at 8.00 revolutions per second

Homework Equations


I= (m)(r^{2}) + (m)(r^{2}) + (m)(r^{2})
K_{rot}=(1/2)Iw^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution



First thing i did was try to find the radius of the triangle. I cut it in half down the middle, making a right angle with a side of .2m and a hypotenuse of .4m.

(0.2^{2}) + (height^{2}) =(0.4^{2})
height = 0.346

I halved the height to get the radius.

Radius: 0.173


Then i used the Equation I= (m)(r^{2}) + (m)(r^{2}) + (m)(r^{2})

I = (0.3)(0.173^{2}) + (0.3)(0.173^{2}) + (0.3)(0.173^{2})

I = 0.027

Then i converted 8 rev per sec into 50.24 rad per sec.

Then i used K_{rot}=(1/2)Iw^{2}

K_{rot}=(1/2)(0.027)(50.24)^{2}

K_{rot} = 136

I don't know what I'm doing wrong. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The radius of rotation isn't 0.173m. Think about it. It's the hypotenuse of a triangle, one of whose sides is 0.2m. It should be the distance from the center of the triangle to the rotating masses, not the "height".
 
Last edited:
wouldn't that be .4 then? I don't think I understand what you're trying to tell me.
 
The 'r' in your formula should be the distance from the axis to the rotating masses. It isn't 0.173m nor is it 0.4m. Rethink your triangle.
 
Thank you. That was a silly place for me to make mistakes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top