A unique rope and pulley problem

AI Thread Summary
A uniform heavy rope of length 2l is positioned over a smooth pulley, with the right side measuring (l+a) and the left side (l-a). The discussion focuses on determining the time it takes for the shorter portion of the rope to slip off the pulley after being released. Participants are encouraged to provide their solutions and reasoning. Additionally, newcomers are reminded to adhere to forum guidelines by posting in the appropriate section and demonstrating effort in their inquiries. Engaging with the community effectively can lead to better assistance.
CygnX1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A uniform heavy rope of length 2l goes over a small smooth pulley such that the right end has length (l+a) while the left end has length (l-a). The shorter portion is held and then released. Find the time taken for the rope to slip off the pulley.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top