Abelian Higgs model and conserved vortex current

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Abelian Higgs model, specifically addressing the Lagrangian presented in Eq-6.19 and the conserved vortex current in Eq-6.21. It is established that in 2+1 dimensions, the expression \(\epsilon^{\mu \nu \lambda} \partial_\nu A_\lambda\) is proportional to the dual field strength tensor, leading to the conclusion that the conserved current \(\hat{J}^\mu\) is derived from the Bianchi identity. The last term in the Lagrangian diverges from the typical \(F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}\) formulation, highlighting the unique characteristics of the model in this dimensionality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Abelian Higgs model
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics in field theory
  • Knowledge of dual field strength tensors
  • Comprehension of Bianchi identities and Maxwell's equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of conserved currents in gauge theories
  • Explore the implications of dimensionality in field theories, particularly in 2+1 dimensions
  • Investigate the role of dual field strength tensors in theoretical physics
  • Review the Bianchi identity and its applications in electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory, gauge theories, and the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

crackjack
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Refer page-24 in http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.0443v3

Eq-6.19 is supposed to be the Lagrangian of Abelian-Higgs models. Eg-6.19 is clearly a conserved current of U(1) symmetry. But I can't show how eq-6.21 is a conserved vortex current.

Note: The last term in the Lagrangian is not the usual F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see it now. I missed the fact that it is a 2+1 dimensional model :blushing:

--
If it helps anyone...

In 2+1 dimensions, \epsilon^{\mu \nu \lambda} \partial_\nu A_\lambda (cf. 6.21) is proportional to the dual field strength tensor:
\hat{J}^\mu \propto \tilde{F}^\mu = \star F_{\nu \lambda}

So, \hat{J}^\muis conserved simply by the Bianchi identity (or the homogeneous Maxwell equation):
\partial_\mu \tilde{F}^\mu = 0

PS: In 2+1 dim, ( \epsilon^{\mu \nu \lambda} \partial_\nu A_\lambda )^2 \propto F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu} (last term in the lagrangian of eq-6.19)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K