Abelian Higgs model and conserved vortex current

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
crackjack
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Refer page-24 in http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.0443v3

Eq-6.19 is supposed to be the Lagrangian of Abelian-Higgs models. Eg-6.19 is clearly a conserved current of U(1) symmetry. But I can't show how eq-6.21 is a conserved vortex current.

Note: The last term in the Lagrangian is not the usual [itex]F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}[/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see it now. I missed the fact that it is a 2+1 dimensional model :blushing:

--
If it helps anyone...

In 2+1 dimensions, [itex]\epsilon^{\mu \nu \lambda} \partial_\nu A_\lambda[/itex] (cf. 6.21) is proportional to the dual field strength tensor:
[tex]\hat{J}^\mu \propto \tilde{F}^\mu = \star F_{\nu \lambda}[/tex]

So, [itex][/itex] [itex]\hat{J}^\mu[/itex]is conserved simply by the Bianchi identity (or the homogeneous Maxwell equation):
[tex]\partial_\mu \tilde{F}^\mu = 0[/tex]

PS: In 2+1 dim, [itex]( \epsilon^{\mu \nu \lambda} \partial_\nu A_\lambda )^2 \propto F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}[/itex] (last term in the lagrangian of eq-6.19)
 
Last edited: