About air resistance in horizontal direction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of a formula for horizontal velocity under air resistance, specifically addressing the force acting in the x-direction. The initial derivation used the equation f = Dv^2, leading to the conclusion that velocity decreases exponentially over time. However, confusion arose regarding the relationship between force and acceleration, particularly the expression -f = mv dv/dx. A correction was proposed, suggesting that the correct differential equation should be -dv/v^2 = Ddx/m, which integrates to yield a different formula for velocity. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately representing the forces and their directions in the equations of motion.
amiras
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was playing with formulas on air resistance and derived formula for velocity in horizontal direction after object was thrown. It looks reasonable but I started have confusion about it, i'd like for you great experts check on its derivation, so here it goes every v is v in x direction.

So I assumed that then object is thrown the only force that acts on it in x direction is air resistance opposite to its velocity, f = Dv^2, where D some constant.

so it should be: f = ma (since the force is in the same direction as acceleration (opposite to object velocity)), but I skipped this part and wrote:

-f = m dv/dx * dx/dt = mv dv/dx

-Dv^2 = mv dv/dx

-D/m dx = dv/v

and after integrating x from 0 to x, and from v0 to v, I've got: v = v0 * e^(-Dx/m)

It looks reasonably to me since velocity always decrease from its maximum value (v0), how its suppose to be.


Now after a while I got confused about this part: -f = mv dv/dx
if f = ma, according to me f \neq mv dv/dx

Is it right because change in velocity over distance is in opposite direction as the force (and acceleration)? But velocity is also in different direction so why it is not like f = m(-v)(-dv/dx)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The differential equation was solved incorrectly. The correct form should have been:
$$-\frac{dv}{v^2}=\frac{Ddx}{m}$$This integrates to $$\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{v_0}=\frac{Dx}{m}$$or$$v=\frac{v_0}{\left(1+\frac{Dv_0x}{m}\right)}$$
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top