About solving differential equations

AI Thread Summary
In solving differential equations in quantum mechanics, the Frobenius method is commonly used for series solutions, particularly after applying separation of variables to partial differential equations. While many physicists prefer separation of variables for its simplicity, certain equations, like u''(t) + u(t) = c, can be solved directly without series methods. The Schrödinger equation can also be effectively solved without series, especially for systems like free particles or finite square wells. However, series solutions can be advantageous when dealing with symmetries, such as spherical or rotational invariance, allowing for more straightforward determination of coefficients in the wave function. Overall, the choice of method depends on the specific problem and its inherent symmetries.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
i'm in my second semester of qm and we've now solved the quantum harmonic oscillator, the spherical well, and the hydrogen atom and all these problems are solved by the frobenius method ( series ). so I'm left wondering if most of the differential equations physicists solve using this method, first separation of variables on the pde and then the frobenius method, power series ansatz, on the resulting odes? if not can someone post some other ones?

note i know that the harmonic oscillator can be solved using operator splitting so if anyone knows of some other problems which are solved like that please post those as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Often physicists make use of series, but that depends on the problem. When possible, they will always start by a separation of variables, because it makes problems much easier. However, if the resulting equation is something like u''(t) + u(t) = c then there is no need to use a power series to solve it (e.g. it is immediately clear that plugging in a solution like u(t) = e^{\lambda t} will do). The Schroedinger equation for a free particle, finite square well, and harmonic oscillator can be solved perfectly well without using a series Ansatz. On the other hand, using a series solution can be easier when you pre-suppose certain symmetries. For example, if you have a potential which is rotationally invariant around the z-axis or even spherically symmetric, you expect the same symmetry for the solution. While it is perfectly possible to solve for the wave function in Cartesian coordinates, it is much more convenient to express the wave-function as a series of spherical harmonics. Such a series is completely determined by its coefficients, and finding them should be easy precisely because of the presence of a symmetry (for example, we can immediately see that those with \ell \neq 0 should not contribute or that a certain coefficient will be zero because the integral which we need to calculate to determine it is anti-symmetric).
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top