Absence of dust on moon and material sciences

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between the absence of dust on the Moon and material sciences, particularly how surfaces interact electronically in low-energy configurations. It highlights that while there is dust on the Moon, it does not remain suspended in the air due to the lack of atmosphere, causing particles to fall quickly. The conversation also touches on the electrostatic properties of lunar dust, which can lead to phenomena like dust levitation and adhesion to surfaces, unlike smoother, weathered dust on Earth. The role of atmosphere in discharging electrostatic charges is emphasized, as it allows dust to fall away more easily. Overall, the unique characteristics of lunar dust raise important considerations for engineering and material science in space exploration.
zankaon
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Might absence of dust on moon (such as for astronauts' experience) relate to importance of material sciences? That is, might surfaces interact electronically, seeking a more stable lowest energy configuration? Imaging it as if 2 grates rubbing together, seeking best fit? Air might then disrupt such surface interaction, such as for Martian dust. Hence then the ancillary idea of moving surfaces slightly intermittently, so as to disrupt such 'settling in', for joints of machines, such as Canadian arm on shuttle, and for space probes such as Huygens-Cassini.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Dust on the moon? What are you on about? There is plenty of dust on the moon. It does not hang in the air because there is no air for it to hang in. Any particle that is not on the surface will fall with NO air resistance, so it is a simply proplem of basic physics to find how long it will take to return to the moons surface.
 
Integral said:
Dust on the moon? What are you on about? There is plenty of dust on the moon. It does not hang in the air because there is no air for it to hang in. Any particle that is not on the surface will fall with NO air resistance, so it is a simply proplem of basic physics to find how long it will take to return to the moons surface.

I think s/he means "adherence" of dust on the Moon. Obviously talking about how "adhesively" the stuff stuck to the "Apollo" moonsuits and everything else.
 
qraal said:
I think s/he means "adherence" of dust on the Moon. Obviously talking about how "adhesively" the stuff stuck to the "Apollo" moonsuits and everything else.

I think you've got it. What role does an atmosphere play in discharging electrostatic charges, so that clinging dust particles may fall-away?
 
Phrak said:
I think you've got it. What role does an atmosphere play in discharging electrostatic charges, so that clinging dust particles may fall-away?

Well atmosphere allows electrostatic charges to slow leak away from a surface and obviously the Moon doesn't have that process to allow charge to escape. It does have some other weird electrostatic effects like levitating dust and dust fountains.
 
Also because of the lack of an atmosphere the dust on the moon is rough and jagged so tends to stick together, especially since there is nothing between adjacent atoms on different dust particles..
On Earth any dust has been weathered into a smoother rounded shape and is less likely to stick together because there is always a surface layer of air/moisture/chemicals on each particle.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top