Absolute magnitude and luminosity

AI Thread Summary
Two stars with the same absolute bolometric magnitude do not necessarily have the same absolute visual magnitude due to differences in their emitted radiation across wavelengths. Bolometric magnitude accounts for all radiation emitted, while visual magnitude focuses solely on the visible spectrum. Consequently, a hot star emitting primarily in the ultraviolet may have a higher bolometric magnitude than its visual magnitude, while a cooler star emitting mostly in the infrared would have a lower visual magnitude. The relationship between power output and magnitude is influenced by the stars' surface temperatures. Understanding these distinctions clarifies the complexities of stellar luminosity and visibility.
Rohan1997
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Do two stars of the same absolute bolometric magnitude have the same absolute visual magnitude?

If this is true; does this mean that two stars with the same power output have the same have the same bolometric magnitude and therefore same visual magnitude?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Rohan1997 said:
Do two stars of the same absolute bolometric magnitude have the same absolute visual magnitude?

If this is true; does this mean that two stars with the same power output have the same have the same bolometric magnitude and therefore same visual magnitude?

When you say bolometric, it's about the radiation emitted at all wavelengths. Visual absolute magnitude, it's about the radiation emitted in the visible part of the spectrum. So you could have stars so hot that they emit the most of their radiation in the UV; for them, the bolometric magnitude would be much bigger than the visual magnitude. In the same way, cool stars would produce most of their radiation in the infrared and again, they would be barely visible (small absolute visual magnitude). It all depends on the surface temperature of the star.
 
  • Like
Likes |Glitch|
virgil1612 said:
When you say bolometric, it's about the radiation emitted at all wavelengths. Visual absolute magnitude, it's about the radiation emitted in the visible part of the spectrum. So you could have stars so hot that they emit the most of their radiation in the UV; for them, the bolometric magnitude would be much bigger than the visual magnitude. In the same way, cool stars would produce most of their radiation in the infrared and again, they would be barely visible (small absolute visual magnitude). It all depends on the surface temperature of the star.

Thank you this has filled the gap in my knowledge :)
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top