Absolute measurement: is it really possible?

AI Thread Summary
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle limits the simultaneous measurement of complementary dynamic observables, raising questions about the precise determination of compatible quantum numbers. It is argued that while chaos affects consecutive measurements, properties of singular events in classical systems can be measured accurately. For instance, a single electron passing through a Stern-Gerlach device demonstrates that specific quantum numbers, like the z-component of spin, can be precisely determined. The discussion highlights the tension between theoretical limits and practical measurement capabilities in both quantum and classical contexts. Ultimately, the possibility of absolute measurement remains a complex and debated topic.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Heisenberg uncertainty forbids measuring exactly and simultaneously complementary dynamic observables, but can even compatible quantum numbers ever be precisely determined? Chaos disturbs consecutive measurement, but can one measure perfectly properties of singular events in those classical systems? In the physical limit, is absolute measurement ever possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Loren Booda
Heisenberg uncertainty forbids measuring exactly and simultaneously complementary dynamic observables, but can even compatible quantum numbers ever be precisely determined? Chaos disturbs consecutive measurement, but can one measure perfectly properties of singular events in those classical systems? In the physical limit, is absolute measurement ever possible?

In principle quantum numbers can be precisely determined. For example: when you send a single electron through a Stern-Gerlag device it is deflected in either of two directions, up or down. The direction is very measurable and thus the z-component of spin, a quantum number, is detectable too.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
943
Back
Top