Absorber Theory, Retarded and Advanced Potentials

FourierFaux
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Hello. I've been reading an interesting article by a pair of smart fellows...

http://rmp.aps.org/pdf/RMP/v21/i3/p425_1

J. A. Wheeler, R. P. Feynman. "Classical Electrodynamics in Terms of Direct Interparticle Action". Reviews of Modern Physics. Volume 21. Number 3. 1949.

I haven't actually taken Quantum Field Theory myself, but I've been trying to wrap my head around the idea of Retarded and Advanced Potentials. From what I've been able to piece together... a retarded potential is one which propagates at a finite speed. An advanced potential is one that propagates instantaneously?! Do I have these definitions correct?

This article may be out of date... but it's interesting to hear his (Wheeler's) voice, the way he thinks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FourierFaux said:
... a retarded potential is one which propagates at a finite speed. An advanced potential is one that propagates instantaneously?! Do I have these definitions correct?

Close, but no cigar!

Retarded potentials travel from the past to the future an a finite speed.

Advanced potentials travel from the future to the past at a finite speed.

For example, an accelerated charge, A, at T1 radiates an retarded wave into the future which scatters another charge, B at T2 > T1. The acceleration of B radiates an advanced wave into the past which arrives at A at precisely T1. So the radiation reaction of charge A due to charge B is felt instantaneously by A. The article you quote was preceded by:

http://authors.library.caltech.edu/11095/1/WHErmp45.pdf

which extensively discusses these advanced and retarded solutions.

Skippy
 
Oh. Thanks Skippy! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top