Absorption of Photon by a Free Electron - Impossible - Conservation Laws?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impossibility of a free electron absorbing a photon due to violations of momentum conservation. When an electron emits a photon during an energy transition, reabsorbing that photon to reverse the transition is problematic because it disrupts the balance of momentum. Participants express confusion about how a centrifuge could theoretically resolve this issue, but details are lacking for a comprehensive explanation. The conversation highlights the challenges in reconciling quantum mechanics with conservation laws. Overall, the consensus is that the scenario presented violates fundamental principles of physics.
Physics Enemy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey,

It seems like this is impossible because momentum conservation is violated. I had a Q where an electron underwent an energy transition and emitted a photon, and then they asked whether it was possible for the photon to be reabsorbed by the electron to undergo the same transition as before (albeit in reverse this time, lower to higher energy level).

Could someone explain why momentum conservation is violated here? Also, the Q suggested that in theory, a centrifuge could 'address' this problem. How exactly?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's pretty much impossible for any of us to give any help, let alone address "How exactly?", with no details being given.
 
SammyS said:
It's pretty much impossible for any of us to give any help, let alone address "How exactly?", with no details being given.
I gave you the details. It's a conceptual Q about whether an electron can absorb a photon. Apparently it violates conservation laws. The second bit is about a centrifuge 'overcoming' this issue. Nothing else is needed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top