AC - frequency affect on RC voltage

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the frequency in an AC circuit affects the voltage across an RC component, causing the voltage trace to lose its exponential characteristics and instead display linear growth and decay. This change is attributed to the rapid direction reversal of current, which prevents the capacitor from building sufficient charge, resulting in a smaller voltage amplitude. The impedance of the capacitor decreases with higher frequency, making it behave more like a short circuit, which further explains the amplitude reduction. The discussion confirms that the analysis focuses on the steady-state response of the circuit, with the RC components arranged in series. Overall, the findings illustrate how frequency impacts RC circuit behavior in AC applications.
StonieJ
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
We observed that whenever the frequency of an AC circuit was increased, the voltage across an RC component changed shape. Specifically, 1) the trace lost its exponential growth and decay and instead had linear growth and decay, and 2) the voltage amplitude was much smaller.

My guess as to the reason this occurs is because an increase in the frequency means that the voltage, and therefore current, in the circuit changes directions more rapidly. Therefore, the current does not travel long enough in a certain direction to allow the capacitor to build up charge. This would explain the smaller amplitude part. I'm also guessing this is the reason it appears linear. Since it is not given enough time to build, you are only seeing the very beginning segment of an exponential growth and decay trace, which appears linear when this time interval is small enough. That is, even a sine wave would look linear if you took a small enough segment.

I don't have the background to answer this question with concrete math formulas (well, I might, but I can't recall them), so I hope this more verbose answer still works. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given a sinusoidal source... there will be a transient response that quickly goes to zero. And a steady - state response which should be a sine wave.
I'm assuming that you're looking at the steady-state response. Also, I'm assuming the R and C are in parallel. What are the other parts of the circuit?

The impedance of a capacitor(when dealing with the steady-state sinusoidal response) is \frac{1}{jwC}, so as frequency gets higher (w gets higher)... the capacitor's impedance drops and it gets more and more like a short circuit. So the voltage across the capacitor drops towards zero as frequency gets higher... so that would explain the amplitude drop.
 
Thanks for the feedback.

Yes, we are only looking at the steady-state response. Also, I believe the RC is in series. If you're really curious, here's a graphic:

https://webspace.utexas.edu/youngba2/www/AC%20circuit.jpg


I'm assuming your answer is still correct, but let me know if it being in series changes anything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
StonieJ said:
Thanks for the feedback.

Yes, we are only looking at the steady-state response. Also, I believe the RC is in series. If you're really curious, here's a graphic:

https://webspace.utexas.edu/youngba2/www/AC%20circuit.jpg


I'm assuming your answer is still correct, but let me know if it being in series changes anything.

Yes... looking at the diagram, it looks to me like you're measuring the voltage across the capacitor (ch2)... and as frequency increases the impedance of the capacitor definitely drops. So what I said above is still correct.

Assuming the source is of the form Vcos(wt+theta)...you can calculate the amplitude (if you wish) by getting the magnitude of:
V\times\frac{\frac{1}{jwC}}{\frac{1}{jwC}+R}

I just used voltage divider to get the above.

You can see from the above that the expression will drop towards 0 as w increases.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top