AC vs. DC Electricity: Why Does AC Travel Further Without Loss?

AI Thread Summary
Power lines primarily use alternating current (AC) for long-distance transmission due to the ease of voltage transformation with transformers, which is crucial for minimizing line losses. High voltages are necessary because power loss in transmission lines is proportional to the square of the current (I^2R losses). Lower current, achieved through higher voltage, results in reduced power dissipation, making AC advantageous over direct current (DC). The discussion highlights the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance in power transmission, emphasizing that while both voltage and current influence power consumption, minimizing current is key to reducing losses in transmission lines.
WarrickF
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

A friend of mine made a strange claim that I was very curious about.

He claims that power lines ( the type that run town to town ) run AC because it travels further distances without loss than DC.

Is this true, and if so why is there a difference?

Thanks
Warrick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is potentially, but not necessarily true. The impedance of a transmission line can indeed be different at different frequencies. However, AC is used not because it suffers lower losses, but because it makes step-up and step-down conversions (with transformers) much easier. Such conversions are necessary, because transmission lines must use high voltages; line loss is dependent upon current. Larger voltages imply smaller currents, which lead to lower loss.

- Warren
 
Thanks chroot, I guess I'll do some more reading before I bug you with the transformer questions. Why is there lower loss when there is smaller currents though?
 
The transmission line is effectively a large, distributed resistance. The power dissipated by a resistor depends on the current through it, not the voltage applied to it. (Consider that applying the same voltage to two different resistances results in two different amounts of power consumption; applying 12 V to an infinite resistance yields no power consumption; applying 12 V to a 1 ohm resistance yields 12 W of power consumption.)

- Warren
 
That makes sense, thanks for you time chroot.
 
chroot said:
The transmission line is effectively a large, distributed resistance. The power dissipated by a resistor depends on the current through it, not the voltage applied to it. (Consider that applying the same voltage to two different resistances results in two different amounts of power consumption; applying 12 V to an infinite resistance yields no power consumption; applying 12 V to a 1 ohm resistance yields 12 W of power consumption.)

- Warren

Are you sure you want to say that something in a resistor depends on current but not on voltage? Your argument works just as well the other way around. 12 amps through zero resistance yields no power consomption.

P.S. applying 12 volts to a 1 ohm resistance yields 144 watts, not 12. ;-)
 
jdavel said:
Are you sure you want to say that something in a resistor depends on current but not on voltage?
Well, okay, voltage and current are related through resistance, so power consumption does depend on both. I didn't want to confuse him too much, but you're right, I misspoke.

The power loss through a resistance R is:

P = I^2 R = \frac{V^2}{R}

The voltage appears divided by the resistance, while the current appears multiplied by it. You don't want a large current for power transmission, you want a large voltage and a small current.

- Warren
 
Back
Top