Accelerated charge inside sphere (again)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a stationary charge within a hollow spherical dielectric shell when an external force is applied. An accelerating charge produces a retarded radiation electric field that exerts a force on the shell, leading to a total force acting on the system. The author proposes that this creates an effective increase in the mass of the charge due to the interaction with the shell's charge, resulting in a modified equation of motion. The internal force from the shell does not contribute to the system's acceleration, as it is considered an internal interaction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of including fields in the analysis to avoid perceived inconsistencies.
johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Sorry to go on about this scenario again but I think something is going on here.

Imagine a stationary charge ##q##, with mass ##m##, at the center of a stationary hollow spherical dielectric shell with radius ##R##, mass ##M## and total charge ##-Q##.

I apply a force ##\mathbf{F}## to charge ##q## so that it accelerates:

$$\mathbf{F} = m \mathbf{a}$$

The accelerating charge ##q## produces a retarded (forwards in time) radiation electric field at the sphere. When integrated over the sphere this field leads to a total force ##\mathbf{f}## on the sphere given by:

$$\mathbf{f} = \frac{2}{3} \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0c^2R}\mathbf{a}.$$

So I apply an external force ##\mathbf{F}## to the system (charge + sphere) but a total force ##\mathbf{F}+\mathbf{f}## operates on the system.

Isn't there an inconsistency here?

As the acceleration of charge ##q## is constant there is no radiation reaction force reacting back on it from its electromagnetic field - so that's not the answer.

Instead maybe there is a reaction force back from the charged shell, ##-\mathbf{f}##, to the charge ##q## so that the equation of motion for the charge is given by:

$$\mathbf{F} - \mathbf{f} = m\mathbf{a}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1)$$

This reaction force might be mediated by an advanced electromagnetic interaction going backwards in time from the shell to the charge so that it acts at the moment the charge is accelerated.

Now the total force acting on the system is the same as the force supplied:

$$ \mathbf{F} - \mathbf{f} + \mathbf{f} = \mathbf{F}.$$

If one rearranges Equation (1) one gets:

$$\mathbf{F} = (m + \frac{2}{3} \frac{qQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0c^2R}) \mathbf{a}$$

Thus the effective mass of the charge ##q## has increased.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
johne1618 said:
So I apply an external force ##\mathbf{F}## to the system (charge + sphere) but a total force ##\mathbf{F}+\mathbf{f}## operates on the system.
Don't forget to include the fields as part of your system (i.e. charge + sphere + fields). Then you see clearly that f is an internal force and therefore causes no acceleration of the system.

If you insist on keeping the fields separate from the objects then there are two forces (transfers of momentum). First, momentum is transferred from the internal charge to the field, then the same amount of momentum is transferred from the field to the sphere.

Btw, this approach of yelling "inconsistency" is quite tiresome and must stop.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top