PhoniexGuy said:
Homework Statement
http://imageshack.us/a/img594/4821/fileeq.jpg
So, the problem is to find the minimum acceleration required to keep the block on the ramp, when the ramp is being pushed at an angle to the horizontal (so going diagonally)
I know that the coefficient of static friction is 0.4 and gravity is 10.0m/s/s
Homework Equations
I think these are what i need to use:
Fnet = ma
FfStatic = uFn
And maybe need w = mg?
The Attempt at a Solution
Well, honestly i have no idea what to do, the final answer is 3.84, but i don't get how to get it.
I tried to do something like this: Fn = 10*sin(30)/0.4 = 12.5, and then the friction force is 0.4*12.5 = 5.0, but no idea what that means. Any help?
I am not surprised.
The problem refers to the minimum acceleration on the block.
I have only ever seen acceleration used with of, not on - such as what is the minimum acceleration
of the block. Is that what is meant here?
It is also a pity that the diagram is so poor. That 30 degree angle is drawn as almost 45, so the visual feedback you are getting is not overly helpful.
With a 30 degree ramp, and a force applied at 60 degrees to the horizontal, it actually means the force, and thus acceleration, is perpendicular to the contact surface.
Now to this problem.
If the block and ramp were stationary you can calculate the component of the weight [
mg] acting down the slope, and the component perpendicular to the slope [F
n].
Than enables you to calculate the friction [μ.F
n]
You will see that the friction force is less than the weight component down the slope - so the block would most certainly slip down the ramp.
You could then calculate how much additional friction - achieved by having a larger Normal Force, F
n, - is needed in order for the block not to slip.
Finally, every one of those forces will have an
m factor in them - since we are not told the mass of the block - and by reference to Newton's Second law F =
ma, we might see that of the extra force needed was 3.84
m Newtons, then that could be achieved by having an acceleration of 3.84 ms
-2, which was their answer. You just have to check whether your calculations yield that figure of 3.84.
Note: I have "bolded" each reference to
m as mass so that it can be distinguished from the m as the unit, metres.