Acceleration and Dark Energy Clarification

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concepts of dark energy and the expansion of the universe, specifically addressing the misconception that the total expansion rate has been declining since the Big Bang. While the overall expansion rate has indeed been decreasing, it has slowed sufficiently in recent billions of years, resulting in galaxies receding from one another at an accelerated rate. The equation v = Hd illustrates that as distance (d) increases, the recession velocity (v) also increases, demonstrating the necessity of dark energy in explaining this acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological principles, including the Big Bang theory
  • Familiarity with the concept of recession velocity in cosmology
  • Knowledge of the Hubble constant and its role in cosmic expansion
  • Basic mathematical skills to interpret equations like v = Hd
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of dark energy in the universe's expansion
  • Study the implications of the Hubble constant on cosmic distances
  • Explore the effects of cosmic acceleration on galaxy formation
  • Learn about observational evidence supporting dark energy theories
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of cosmology, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of the universe's expansion and the role of dark energy.

something111
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.
I am having a few issues completely comprehending dark energy and the expansion of the universe, and I need some clarification on certain aspects of it.

Alright, so I believe that my issue lies within what really acceleration is.
I am aware than as an object's distance is increased from us, its speed increases proportionally.
However I've been told that the absolute total expansion rate of the universe has been declining ever since the big bang.
Using this model, I don't see where dark energy is necessary at all.
For the first matter, the reason why an objects recession velocity is increased proportional to distance is because there being more space in between the two objects, and therefore more space to expand.
For the second matter, the total rate is declining so I see no need for acceleration.
I know that I'm missing something and in no way am I purposing that the scientists today are wrong, I would just like to know what is wrong my my above reasoning.
Thanks in advance for the help; I'm a layman so please stick to light mathematical descriptions if that's possible! :)
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Yes, the overall expansion rate has been declining. However, in the last few billion years it has been declining slow enough that galaxies are now moving away from one another at an accelerated rate.

To see how this can occur, consider what would happen if the expansion rate is constant. The recession velocity of a far-away galaxy is given by v = Hd, where H is the expansion rate and d is the distance. If the expansion rate is a constant, then as the galaxy gets further away (as d increases), the recession velocity also increases.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K