Acceleration around a running track

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a runner on a circular track with a radius of 31.8m and a speed of 5.11m/s. The initial calculations attempted to find angular velocity and acceleration, but the distinction between speed and velocity was highlighted, noting that velocity is a vector with direction. It was clarified that since the runner maintains a constant speed, the acceleration is centripetal, directed towards the center of the circular path. The correct acceleration value of 0.821m/s² was confirmed, emphasizing that no tangential acceleration exists due to the constant speed. The conversation underscores the importance of understanding centripetal acceleration in circular motion.
Ardinos
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


He is running around a running track training for a 400m race. His velocity is 5.11m/s around the circular end of the track, which has a radius of 31.8m.
I'm trying to find his acceleration which I know is 0.821ms-2 but I can't find out how to get it.

Homework Equations


v=rω
d=rθ
a=rα
ω=θ/t
α=ω/t
ω=2πf
ƒ=1/T

The Attempt at a Solution


I first calculated his angular velocity of 0.160rad/s. Then re-arranged d=rθ to θ=d/r and got 12.57rad. Then I re-arranged ω=θ/t to get t=ω/θ and got 0.0127s which I know must be wrong... anyways I then used α=ω/t and got 12.59rads-2 and finally a=rα and I got 400ms-2 and the answer is 0.821ms-2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The statement of the question is not quite right. The 5.11m/s is a speed, not a velocity. Velocity is a vector so also has a direction. The speed is just the magnitude of the velocity.
Since the speed is constant, the acceleration consists of its changes in direction. What kind of acceleration do you associate with an object going around in circles? What equations do you know that relate to that?
 
If it is asking to find the acceleration then I assume I will be using a=rα to convert the angular acceleration from α=ω/t to 'linear' (not sure if that's that right word) acceleration. The problem is I can't find the time or if the displacement of 400m is relevant. And yes I think it is meant to say speed but it says velocity.
 
Ardinos said:
If it is asking to find the acceleration then I assume I will be using a=rα to convert the angular acceleration from α=ω/t to 'linear' (not sure if that's that right word) acceleration.
No, that formula is for a as the tangential acceleration. Since speed is constant, there is no tangential acceleration, and so no angular acceleration.
When speed is constant, the only possible acceleration is at right angles to the direction of travel. Have you heard of centripetal acceleration?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top