Acceleration as a function of position, and time taken to travel a distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time taken for a body to travel a distance from an initial position, given its initial acceleration as a function of position and starting from rest. The acceleration is defined as a = -GM/Ro^2, leading to the differential equation r'' = -GM/r^2. The integration process involves multiplying both sides by r' and simplifying to derive the equation (dr/dt)^2 = 2GM/r. A proposed solution for time is t = (1/3) * SQRT(2/GM) * Ro^(3/2), though concerns are raised about missing a constant of integration in the calculations. The conversation highlights the complexities of integrating motion equations in gravitational fields.
jmz34
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I've been doing a problem that requires me to find the time taken to travel a certain distance if I know the initial acceleration of a body at the starting position and its initial velocity (starts from rest). The acceleration is a function of position a=-GM/(Ro^2).

So say a body is released from rest a distance Ro from a point mass, and it's initial acceleration is that stated above- how would I go about finding the time taken to travel this distance (from Ro to the origin.


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi jmz34! :wink:

so r'' = -GM/r2 ?

multiply both sides by r' …

r'r'' = -GMr'/r2

… and integrate :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi jmz34! :wink:

so r'' = -GM/r2 ?

multiply both sides by r' …

r'r'' = -GMr'/r2

… and integrate :smile:

Using this method I did this:

d/dt(0.5*(r')^2)=(-GM/r^2)r'

then integrated once and simplified to get

(dr/dt)^2=2GM/r

solving this for t gives:

t=(1/3)*SQRT(2/GM)*Ro^(3/2)

If you could have a quick look at my method I'd be very grateful.

Thanks alot.
 
jmz34 said:
Using this method I did this:

d/dt(0.5*(r')^2)=(-GM/r^2)r'

then integrated once and simplified to get

(dr/dt)^2=2GM/r.

yes, but after that i get a bit lost …

you seem to have lost r completely, and you don't have a constant of integration :confused:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top