Acceleration due to Gravity: calculate initial velocity

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the initial velocity of a pole vaulter who travels 4.0 m up and then 4.0 m back down in 1.81 seconds, the correct approach involves understanding the total displacement and using kinematic equations. The initial calculation mistakenly used a total distance of 8 m instead of the relevant displacement of 4 m. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing that the upward and downward journeys contribute to the overall time but not to the net displacement. By applying first principles and considering the peak speed and acceleration due to gravity, the initial velocity can be accurately determined. Ultimately, the correct interpretation of the problem is crucial for solving the physics question effectively.
Archedcutie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A Pole vaulter leaves the ground to travel 4.0 m up and over the bar, and then another 4.0 m back to the ground. It takes 1.81 s for the whole trip. Caculate the velocity with which she left the ground.


2. Homework Equations

Well the equation I used which I saw in my textbook was, v1[initial speed] = d-1/2[g][t]^2


3. The Attempt at a Solution

I subbed it in as v1= 8m- 1/2 [9.8N/kg][1.81s]^2
and I didn't get 8.8m/s [up] like the answer at the back of the textbook :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think 8m in the equation is wrong. How I read the problem is she travel up (y) 4 m, and then down 4 m, so the d = 4m. maybe that is it? I am not too sure, but maybe it's worth a try.
 
Hi,

if you forget 'THE equation' approach and think back to first principles.

The whole journey takes 1.81 s.

How long will the up part of the journey take?

The vaulter starts at a speed v, vertically.

At the peak of the vault what is their vertical speed?

now, you should be able to work it out as you have end speed, acceleration, distance and time!Cheers
 
on the aimslin22 front:

they travel up 4m and down 4m - so their overall displacement (Not distance) is...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top